Eyes On The Money
Disclaimer: All content on this site is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. The analyses and strategies presented here are personal musings and opinions. You are solely responsible for any investment decisions you make. Investing involves risk of loss, and past performance does not guarantee future results. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.
All reports (SMR)

NuScale Power (SMR) — Buy Strategy & Analysis

SMR update

NuScale Power (SMR) — Buy Strategy & Analysis

Date: 2026-03-06


Current Situation

Metric Value
Price $11.70
52-Week High $57.42 (Oct 15, 2025)
52-Week Low $11.08
Distance from High -79.6%
Distance from Low +5.6%
Market Cap $3.73B
Shares Outstanding ~319M (estimated)
Beta 2.25
Forward P/E -29.54 (not profitable)
50-day MA $16.51
200-day MA $30.53
Cash on Hand $1.3B (Dec 31, 2025)

SMR is trading near its 52-week low, down ~80% from the October 2025 peak. The stock is deep below both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages.


Price History — The Collapse

Period Event Price Action
May-Oct 2025 AI/nuclear hype cycle $17 → $57.42 (+238%)
Oct 15-22, 2025 Post-peak selloff $57.42 → $34.72 (-40%)
Nov 3-7, 2025 ENTRA1 scandal breaks $40.83 → $30.34 (-26%)
Nov 7-21, 2025 Continued ENTRA1 fallout $30.34 → $18.60 (-39%)
Dec 2025 Brief bounce, then decline $18-22 range
Jan 2026 Fluor share sale begins $20.51 → $17.48
Feb 2026 Fluor dumps 71M shares, lawsuit filed $17.53 → $12.85
Mar 1-6, 2026 Hormuz crisis + continued selling $13.05 → $11.70

The decline has been driven by specific negative catalysts, not just market conditions. This matters for any buy thesis — you need to assess whether the catalysts are temporary or structural.


What Went Wrong

1. ENTRA1 Partnership Disaster

On November 6, 2025, NuScale disclosed that:

Stock dropped 12.4% in two days. A securities class action was filed (deadline: April 20, 2026).

2. Fluor Corporation Exit

3. Massive Dilution

4. No Firm Contracts


What's Still Standing

1. Only NRC-Approved SMR Design

NuScale's VOYGR is the only small modular reactor design with full NRC approval (January 2023). This is a genuine competitive moat. Competitors (OKLO, X-energy, Kairos) are years behind on the regulatory path.

2. $1.3B Cash Position

At the current operating burn rate of ~$172-200M/year (excluding the ENTRA1 one-time), NuScale has approximately 6-7 years of runway. They are not facing imminent dilution for survival. They can afford to wait for contracts.

3. Secular Tailwinds

4. TVA Pipeline

Partnership to deploy up to 6GW across seven states. If even one project gets a firm order, it changes the narrative entirely.


Valuation Floor Analysis

Approach Value/Share Notes
Cash per share $4.08 $1.3B ÷ 319M shares
Cash + IP value ~$6-8 Assigning $600M-$1.2B for only NRC-approved SMR design
Enterprise value $2.43B Market cap minus cash
EV / Revenue 77x On $31.5M FY2025 revenue — absurd by any metric

The cash floor at ~$4/share provides a rough downside estimate in a liquidation scenario. The NRC approval has genuine value but is hard to price without contracts.

There is no reasonable fundamental valuation for this stock at current prices. It trades entirely on narrative and optionality. At $11.70, the market is pricing ~$7.60/share of option value above cash — essentially a bet that NuScale will eventually land contracts.


Financials

Income Statement (FY2024, most recent annual)

Item Amount
Revenue $37.0M
Cost of Revenue $4.9M
Gross Profit $32.1M
R&D $46.8M
SG&A $75.9M
Operating Loss -$138.7M
Net Loss -$136.6M
EPS -$1.47

FY2025 (Reported Feb 26, 2026)

Item Amount
Revenue $31.5M (declining)
G&A Expenses $609.8M (incl. $507.4M ENTRA1 payment)
Cash Position $1.3B

Cash Flow

Year Operating CF Free Cash Flow
2024 -$108.7M -$108.7M
2023 -$183.3M -$185.0M
2022 -$148.6M -$150.9M

Cash burn has been improving, though 2025 will look worse due to the ENTRA1 payment.


Technical Analysis

Current Structure

Key Levels to Watch

Level Significance
$11.08 52-week low — break below is very bearish
$13.00-13.50 Immediate resistance, needs to reclaim
$16.50 50-day MA — a close above signals trend change
$20.00 Psychological level, pre-Fluor dump
$30.50 200-day MA — bull market confirmation

Risk Assessment

Severe Risks

  1. Fluor selling continues through Q2 2026. 40M shares at current prices ≈ $468M of supply. This is a structural headwind.
  2. Securities class action (deadline April 20). Outcome uncertain. Even if it settles, it validates concerns about management judgment.
  3. ENTRA1 $495M payment. Management credibility is damaged. They paid half a billion dollars to a partner with no track record. This raises questions about governance.
  4. No revenue path. Pre-revenue companies with declining revenue and no firm contracts can go to zero. The NRC approval is valuable but worthless without commercial deployment.
  5. Further dilution possible. They have $1.3B cash now, but if they need more, they'll issue more shares.

Moderate Risks

  1. Nuclear sentiment reversal. If AI power demand narrative fades or gas prices fall, nuclear urgency drops.
  2. Regulatory changes. NRC approval is design-specific; site approvals still required per project.
  3. Competition. Other SMR designs (GE-Hitachi BWRX-300, X-energy Xe-100) progressing.

What Could Go Right

  1. TVA firm order — would reprice the stock significantly
  2. Japan framework money materializes — $25B is transformative
  3. Fluor finishes selling — removes structural overhang by Q2 2026
  4. Class action settles cheaply — removes uncertainty
  5. Another utility contract — validates commercial viability

What I Would Monitor

Signal Interpretation
Fluor 13D filing showing 0 shares Selling pressure removed — bullish
Class action settlement terms If cheap (<$50M), management gets off easy — neutral/bullish
TVA site selection announcement Pre-contract milestone — bullish
Quarterly cash burn >$60M Accelerating spend without revenue — bearish
New ATM offering announced More dilution incoming — bearish
Insider buying Management putting skin in game — bullish
NRC certification for uprated design Expands addressable market — bullish

Comparison with BHI (083650.KQ)

Both are nuclear plays, but they are fundamentally different:

Factor SMR (NuScale) BHI (083650.KQ)
Revenue $31.5M (declining) Real revenue, profitable
Contracts None firm ₩1.54T+ backlog
Cash $1.3B (from dilution) Operational cash generation
Stage Pre-commercial Operating manufacturer
Institutional flow Fluor exiting Institutions accumulating
Lawsuit Active class action None
Valuation basis Narrative/optionality Earnings/contracts

BHI is a nuclear thesis backed by real business. SMR is a nuclear thesis backed by an NRC approval and cash.


Summary

SMR at $11.70 is a damaged stock with legitimate long-term optionality. The NRC approval is real, the cash runway is real, and the secular tailwinds for nuclear are real. But the near-term picture is ugly: Fluor dumping shares through Q2, an active securities lawsuit, management credibility damaged by the ENTRA1 debacle, and no firm contracts.

The staged buy approach protects you from catching a falling knife while still getting exposure near the lows. The most important gate is Fluor finishing its sales — until that overhang clears, the stock faces persistent supply regardless of any positive catalyst.

If you're adding to an existing losing position, be honest about total exposure. This is speculative. The cash floor (~$4/share) means it probably doesn't go to zero, but it could easily trade $8-9 before any recovery.


Sources: Yahoo Finance, NuScale Power press releases, SEC filings, Motley Fool, Seeking Alpha, Nuclear Engineering International

Buy Strategy

Disclaimer: The strategy below represents personal musings and opinions, not investment advice. You are solely responsible for any trading decisions you make.

Context: You already hold a small position at a loss. You want to add. The stock is near its 52-week low with severe headwinds but legitimate long-term optionality.

Approach: Staged Dollar-Cost Average with Catalyst Gates

This is a high-risk speculative position. Do not allocate more than you can afford to lose entirely.

Tranche 1: Near Current Levels ($11-12)

  • Size: $500
  • Suggested order: Limit buy $11.25, ~44 shares, good for 1 week
  • Rationale: Near 52-week low, much bad news priced in. $11.25 sits just above the 52-week low ($11.08), which acts as a magnet. Daily lows are trending toward it at ~$0.15-0.20/day. If it never fills, the stock found support — better outcome for existing position.
  • Risk: Fluor still selling, could break $11.08

Recent daily lows supporting the $11.25 target:

Date Low Close
Mar 2 $12.27 $13.05
Mar 3 $11.74 $12.53
Mar 4 $12.50 $12.54
Mar 5 $11.75 $12.18
Mar 6 $11.61 $11.70
  • More aggressive fill: $11.50
  • Greedier: $11.00 (right at 52-week low)

Tranche 2: After Fluor Selling Completes (expected Q2 2026)

  • Size: 25% of intended additional allocation
  • Trigger: Fluor files showing zero remaining shares, or public announcement
  • Rationale: Removes largest structural selling pressure. This is the most important catalyst gate.
  • Expected price range: Unknown — could be higher or lower than today depending on market

Tranche 3: On First Firm Contract

  • Size: 25% of intended additional allocation
  • Trigger: TVA firm construction commitment, or any other binding contract with construction timeline
  • Rationale: Transforms SMR from "story stock" to "pipeline stock." You will likely pay more per share but with dramatically less risk.

Tranche 4: Reserve

  • Size: 25% of intended additional allocation
  • Use: Opportunistic — either on a sharp selloff (break below $11.08) or on a second contract announcement
  • Rationale: Keeps powder dry for either a capitulation buy or momentum confirmation

Alternative: Aggressive Bottom-Fish

If the stock breaks below $11.08:

  • Watch for $8-9 range (pre-hype levels, April 2025)
  • Consider Tranche 1 at those levels instead
  • A break below $11.08 with volume means the market doesn't believe in the current floor

Stop-Loss Consideration

Given this is speculative:

  • Hard stop: Consider a mental stop at $6-7 (approaching cash value per share). If it trades there, the market is pricing potential cash burn / further ENTRA1 losses.
  • No stop: If you view this as pure long-term optionality and the total allocation is money you can lose, no stop may be appropriate — the cash runway gives you 6-7 years.